We review a sentence for reasonableness under an abuse of discretion standard. We therefore affirm Eckles' convictions.Ĭounsel next questions whether Eckles' 262-month sentence is reasonable. 2005) (discussing elements of offense of possession with intent to distribute).
Reid, 523 F.3d 310, 317 (4th Cir.) (discussing elements of § 846 offense), cert. 680 (1942) (providing standard) United States v. Moreover, our review of the trial testimony convinces us that substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict on each count. This court, however, "do not weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses, but assume that the jury resolved any discrepancies in favor of the government." United States v. We affirm the convictions, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing.Ĭounsel first questions whether the evidence supported the jury's verdict, asserting that the witnesses lacked credibility.
Amadine eckles of us air pro#
Eckles was informed of her right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but she did not do so. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal but questioning whether the evidence supported the jury's verdict and whether the sentence is reasonable. Eckles' counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. The district court sentenced her to a total of 262 months of imprisonment. § 841(a)(1) (2006) and possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of crack cocaine, in violation of § 841(a)(1). § 846 (2006) possession with intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. A jury convicted Shonika Gail Eckles of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of crack cocaine, more than five kilograms of cocaine, and more than 1000 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
0 kommentar(er)
